Woodland Hills, CA July 21, 2004 – Mesothelioma Advisor has published a new report on the proposed regulations, which will have a negative impact of asbestos victims, available at http:// www.mesothelioma-advisor.org/article- 1. php. The article was written by Eric N. Scholnick, Attorney. It 'was recently reported by The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, among other things, that thousands of people who were blameless filing asbestos personal injury cases. These new reports indicate that these claims of asbestos may threaten the financial health of many large corporations.

The company responsible for the insurance companies are listed on the need for federal legislation to control asbestos cases. In their words, they want to make money will go to those who genuinely sick.It is important to see the big lie behind these new stories.Persons who have suffered harm at the hands of another right to request access to the courts., Mesothelioma treatment, It's never been a requirement that persons be impaired or disabled to compensation, are only wounded. The presence of very high concentrations of asbestos fibers in the lungs is clearly a disadvantage.

Most people who have never been heavily exposed to asbestos would never trade lungs with a Navy veteran, even though this veteran of the Navy had not yet suffered an impairment or disability. individuals exposed to asbestos have a much higher risk of developing mesothelioma (a cancer of the lung or stomach lining), lung cancer, asbestosis or later in life. It should be left to the jury to decide whether the presence of these fibers constitutes an injury under the law. Access to our judicial system is an important right, the judicial system protects Americans from big companies that sell dangerous products and concealed the dangers of these products to the public.

Instead, large companies have the asbestos nightmare upon us, and their insurance companies, now in federal legislative power to restrict access to, or take the place of the American jury system. The legislation, which previously was proposed to appoint an Audit Committee, and make it mandatory that each asbestos case be reviewed by the Committee to determine whether a person was entitled to compensation. All cases would be delayed so that some candidates die before their case could be reviewed, and most cases would be dismissed.

The reason for this proposal should be obvious. After years of always lose in front of juries, asbestos companies and insurance companies are again paying attention to the almighty dollar, the rights of injured people. This is exactly what these companies have in the years 1920, 1930, 1940, 1950 and later, as they did their best to maintain awareness of the risks of asbestos-and companies public.The insurance companies say they want to ensure that the seriously wounded compensation. And 'hypocritical that these same companies have fought and lost, the valid applications for decades.

Now, suddenly, say they are worried for the victims. Do not believe them. The number of asbestos claims is slowing in large part because the company kept selling asbestos products, asbestos also in 1980. They lied to their customers, arguing that the products were safe, and keep the asbestos products on the market long after they should have been there. More information can be found in mesothelioma Advisor (http://www.mesothelioma-advisor.org/. The site contains informative articles on topics such as mesothelioma treatments, symptoms, palliative care and more.